Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The meme compresses the interview into a continuous Van Jones quotation even though Chris Cillizza interjected between 'the House' and 'the Supreme Court.'

Type TEXTUAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 5130

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 108 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 69, shared 38. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Politics · 56fe4c61 Memes · 56fe4c61

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 2 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 2 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:affc8509-a3ae-84a1-9142-cfb4663b73fa

Not yet independently audited.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Cillizza interjected 'Totally agree' inside the passage, so the meme compresses a conversational exchange into one continuous quote. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt shows Jones saying 'the House,' Cillizza interjecting 'Totally agree,' and Jones continuing with 'the Supreme Court,' directly supporting the claim that the meme compresses the exchange into one continuous quotation.

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 2 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:146d0026af21d87f8f8aa3904f9d1cf463c3ec79b157d55417156dd202afdd15

Last changed at entry seq 11004; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
05359d24 support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 1.800000
5def9e67 support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 05359d24)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 1.800000 (the counted weights) = 1.800000 → probability 0.8581

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.7790 to 0.9121, a spread of 0.1331.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
70c326dd05359d24

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedyesf385198c
opposing search doneyes1e05e98d
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Cillizza interjected 'Totally agree' inside the passage, so the meme compresses a conversational exchange into one continuous quote. c01487ea

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 70c326dd

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 1e05e98d

Review checks: 2 of 4. coverage:affc8509-a3ae-84a1-9142-cfb4663b73fa

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
5130APPENDED
5131ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
5154LINK_EVIDENCEby 56fe4c61 (accepted)
8396TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "affc8509-a3ae-84a1-9142-cfb4663b73fa",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "d6acf9ac-4760-8a5a-8746-473505359d24",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "dd846aeb-4c65-8490-8da3-b60cc01487ea",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "d6acf9ac-4760-8a5a-8746-473505359d24",
      "link": "f384aa78-692e-8acf-a0f4-f6805def9e67",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "da8048b7-f1e9-819c-a319-707470c326dd",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1331",
    "permissive": "0.9121",
    "conservative": "0.7790"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "TEXTUAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8581",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "1.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 11004,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.50",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "01a0c33f-de1c-73cc-8403-9a1cf385198c"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [
        "01a0c33f-de0b-735e-9768-4bfc1e05e98d"
      ],
      "ok": true
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "1.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}