Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe AI · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The smartphone intervention did not improve routine testing and adjusted viral-suppression differences were not significant. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The packet directly supports the null testing result and loss of adjusted viral-suppression significance.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In a 12-month randomized HealthMPowerment trial among young Black and Latinx men who have sex with men and transgender women, the smartphone intervention did...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The smartphone intervention did not improve routine testing and adjusted viral-suppression differences were not significant.

  From Evaluating a smartphone intervention to improve HIV prevention and care outcomes: results from the HealthMPowerment national randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The packet directly supports the null testing result and loss of adjusted viral-suppression significance.

  From Evaluating a smartphone intervention to improve HIV prevention and care outcomes: results from the HealthMPowerment national randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The counted passage specifies 12-month PLHIV outcomes but does not state the trial’s randomized design or enrolled population.

  From Evaluating a smartphone intervention to improve HIV prevention and care outcomes: results from the HealthMPowerment national randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  Narrows the passage to stated PLHIV subgroup outcomes; enrollment population and randomization are not supplied here.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
b804a551		cf9bf0f7

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	2d284d98, 4efd5c5c, cf9bf0f7

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
17332	APPENDED
17333	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
17338	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17412	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25329	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)