Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The reported pregnant-mouse SK3 mechanism was tested primarily at gestational day 14 and used craving-like assays involving highly palatable diets, rather than a direct human food-craving measure.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25201

27 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 87 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 87, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:cf40dc62-9222-803c-80ac-d141ceaca1ea

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Leans supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary article specifies G14 female mice and BioDAQ craving-like assays involving highly palatable, high-fat, or high-sucrose diets. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
ceaca1eaNARROWS3f7f722c

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyese512b828

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary article specifies G14 female mice and BioDAQ craving-like assays involving highly palatable, high-fat, or high-sucrose diets. c6fb4d8d

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 05bedf9f

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:cf40dc62-9222-803c-80ac-d141ceaca1ea

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
25201APPENDED
25202ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25208TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)