Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the study, abrupt acidification produced diatom growth and carbon-fixation responses up to 15% larger than under gradual acidification.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19921

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 123 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 97, shared 25. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Climate · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:db12df68-6aac-8f2d-a4d2-b1a82f046c25

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the difference in growth and carbon-fixation responses. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports that abrupt acidification exaggerates diatom growth and carbon-fixation responses by up to 15%.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
b73c7509cd6169a8

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyescd6169a8, 01757e13, ba6b23b7

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the difference in growth and carbon-fixation responses. 36f8ae29

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. b73c7509

Qualifier: The up-to-15% difference was measured in a 1100-generation Chaetoceros muelleri experiment comparing CO2 increases from 440 to 1000 ppm. 60aa0347

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:db12df68-6aac-8f2d-a4d2-b1a82f046c25

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19921APPENDED
19922ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19937LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24802TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
26019TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)