Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Society · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports the 621-participant design and the condition-dependent group-versus-solitary performance result. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports the 621-participant design, groups of five, mobile-resource task, and payoff-dependent group advantage.; The primary Nature Communications study directly reports the 621-person experiment and the condition that groups outperformed solitary participants only with payoff information.; The primary experiment reports the 621-person design and the condition under which groups outperformed solitary participants.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In an online 3D immersive-reality experiment with 621 participants, groups of five outperformed solitary participants in tracking a mobile resource only when...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In an online 3D immersive-reality experiment with 621 participants, groups of five outperformed solitary participants in tracking a mobile resource only when...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In an online 3D immersive-reality experiment with 621 participants, groups of five outperformed solitary participants in tracking a mobile resource only when...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “A 2026 Nature Communications immersive-reality experiment tested how payoff information affects human collective tracking of a moving resource.” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The abstract reports the 621-participant design and the condition-dependent group-versus-solitary performance result.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The abstract directly states the sample, group size, task, and payoff-information condition.

• The excerpt directly reports the 621-participant design, groups of five, mobile-resource task, and payoff-dependent group advantage.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage explicitly states every core element of the claim.

• The primary Nature Communications study directly reports the 621-person experiment and the condition that groups outperformed solitary participants only with payoff information.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary peer-reviewed collective-intelligence study; distinct social-cognition and immersive-reality topic.

• The primary experiment reports the 621-person design and the condition under which groups outperformed solitary participants.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Independent primary behavioral experiment.

• The primary experiment reports that, in the fast-resource condition, full payoff sharing improved group performance relative to solitary participants while no payoff sharing reduced it.

  From Payoff selectivity drives collective intelligence during dynamic resource tracking in humans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Additional primary behavioral passage.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
1fcfcfb7		dcc269d3
a63df259		dcc269d3
1e2693bc		dcc269d3

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	f93e0f66, 20679880, 1e4279d2, dcc269d3, 511f71b7

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
14960	APPENDED
14961	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14972	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
14977	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17378	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20130	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20178	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)