Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the study’s Bayesian protein phylogenies, each of the five Bianfu Cave samples formed a monophyletic group with Denisova 3 with posterior probability of 100%.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19229

Referenced 100 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 76, shared 23. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Archaeology · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:ec9ed683-83ce-8075-aceb-b5e8e42ed87f

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports monophyletic placement with Denisova 3 and 100% posterior probability for each sample. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports each Bianfu Cave sample grouped with Denisova 3 at 100% posterior probability.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
e8cf9186ac9a4506

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd8630bc8, ee673e9b, ac9a4506

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports monophyletic placement with Denisova 3 and 100% posterior probability for each sample. cb0ad567

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. e8cf9186

Qualifier: The five samples had unequal sequence coverage, representing 18.6% to 36.7% of total protein alignments, and were dated to Middle Pleistocene layers. bffa8894

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:ec9ed683-83ce-8075-aceb-b5e8e42ed87f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19229APPENDED
19230ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19245LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24754TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25951TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)