Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The malaria-services result came from a rapid 2025 assessment of 108 WHO country offices, covering 64 malaria-endemic countries.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 13265

Referenced 92 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 72, shared 19. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 0 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:f5de1798-f23f-8cdb-bddb-ec5b990ea175

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 0 of 4 review checks have been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: KFF reports a rapid 2025 assessment of 108 WHO country offices covering 64 malaria-endemic countries. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
990ea175NARROWS3f4138e8

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedno

Summary

Supported. The main support is: KFF reports a rapid 2025 assessment of 108 WHO country offices covering 64 malaria-endemic countries. 05f27cda

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 43260554

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:f5de1798-f23f-8cdb-bddb-ec5b990ea175

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
13265APPENDED
13266ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
13284LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)