Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

AI · 1efd24fe Medicine · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The trial found no primary disability advantage for either AI program, while an exploratory resting-pain difference favored DeepSeek-R1. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports the randomized sample, null disability comparison, and exploratory resting-pain advantage for DeepSeek-R1.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In a triple-masked randomized trial of 75 adults with subacromial pain syndrome, clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 exercise programs added to...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “In a triple-masked randomized trial of 75 adults with subacromial pain syndrome, clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 exercise programs added to...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The trial found no primary disability advantage for either AI program, while an exploratory resting-pain difference favored DeepSeek-R1.

  From Clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o– and DeepSeek-R1–assisted exercise programmes added to standard physiotherapy for subacromial pain syndrome: a triple-masked randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The passage directly reports the randomized sample, null disability comparison, and exploratory resting-pain advantage for DeepSeek-R1.

  From Clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o– and DeepSeek-R1–assisted exercise programmes added to standard physiotherapy for subacromial pain syndrome: a triple-masked randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• Independent coverage reports the null disability comparison and exploratory DeepSeek-R1 resting-pain advantage, while cautioning that the latter requires replication.

  From AI-designed shoulder rehab matches human therapy plans Read 2026-09-29 Relevance STRONG Steps 0 Counted

  Secondary commentary is a separate publication lineage from the Scientific Reports article; it summarizes the same trial and its limitations.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The result is a six-week outpatient trial of Turkish adults aged 18–65 with 69 completers, testing clinician-curated AI programs as additions to identical physiotherapy; no superiority or equivalence is established, and the resting-pain signal is exploratory.

  From Clinician-curated ChatGPT-4o– and DeepSeek-R1–assisted exercise programmes added to standard physiotherapy for subacromial pain syndrome: a triple-masked randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Clarifies jurisdiction/setting, eligibility, completer denominator, co-treatment, follow-up interval, multiplicity handling, and non-equivalence interpretation.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
a8a3f262		ec641a83

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	ec641a83, 82251f14, 7a8348d4

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
18382	APPENDED
18383	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18388	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
18406	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
18417	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25455	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)