Evidence item

The excerpt contrasts a generalist model with a PINN, says it spent 88 hours reasoning from first principles, and qualifies the absence of fine-tuning with "as far as I can tell." It does not explicitly say in this excerpt that the model solved Navier-Stokes. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 8064

Source: OpenAI Agents Hijack a German Website, Jensen Declares AGI Arrived, and OpenAI Solves Navier-Stokes · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:c4ad223ea916ca5c40a9bba5396f9c6b3883a074714d48aeb6a09800f77f7f1a

they got trounced by a generalist model. It wasn't a pin that solved Navier Stokes in the end. It was just a generalist model that spent 88 hours reasoning from first principles without as far as I can tell any fine tuning