Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Evidence item

The supplied passage directly reports LRG2 concentration, weakening after removal, and failure under look-elsewhere correction across seven bins. DIRECT_TEXT

Authenticity UNVERIFIED · extraction UNVERIFIED · independence group none (unreviewed) · created seq 22016

Source: A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI's Dynamical Dark Energy Signal · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:405fb165a5a29496b3d3794627dfd9f215dd9cb7e5ec5c06120032c82eb69cdd

Exact excerpt
Applied to the DESI DR1→ DR2 BAO sequence, the result depends strongly on which departures from ΛCDM the test is designed to detect. For a pre-specified alternative aligned with the DR2-preferred direction, the running evidence reaches MDR2 = 33.97, crossing the threshold of 20 that corresponds to an illustrative 5% false-detection rate and which we use throughout. However, evidence against the null is concentrated almost entirely in the LRG2 redshift bin and removing that bin reduces the running e-value to M = 0.49, mildly favouring ΛCDM. Furthermore, when the analysis allows for any of the seven DESI bins to have possibly produced the excess, the signal does not survive a look-elsewhere correction.

Linked claims

ClaimDirectionRelevanceStepsCounted
a77b6958SUPPORTDIRECT0yes

Audits

None.