Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Astronomy and space · 1efd24fe Physics · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The supplied passage directly reports LRG2 concentration, weakening after removal, and failure under look-elsewhere correction across seven bins. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The sequential reanalysis abstract directly reports concentration in LRG2, weakening after its removal, and failure under look-elsewhere correction.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A sequentially valid reanalysis found that evidence against ΛCDM was concentrated almost entirely in the DESI LRG2 redshift bin, weakened to mild support for...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “Recent analyses of DESI DR2 and complementary cosmological data report a roughly 3-sigma fit-level preference for evolving dark energy over ΛCDM in a...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The sequential reanalysis abstract directly reports concentration in LRG2, weakening after its removal, and failure under look-elsewhere correction.

  From A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI's Dynamical Dark Energy Signal Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• An independent DESI DR2 analysis likewise finds that low-redshift LRG tracers drive much of the apparent preference and that removing them reduces it.

  From Evidence for evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon+, DES-Dovekie, and Union3 Read 2026-09-29 Relevance STRONG Steps 0 Counted

• The supplied passage directly reports LRG2 concentration, weakening after removal, and failure under look-elsewhere correction across seven bins.

  From A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI's Dynamical Dark Energy Signal Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage explicitly states each component of the target claim.

• The reanalysis localizes evidence against ΛCDM to LRG2; removing it mildly favors ΛCDM, and seven-bin look-elsewhere correction removes the signal.

  From A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI’s Dynamical Dark Energy Signal Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The reported sequential evidence is conditional on a pre-specified alternative aligned with DR2’s preferred direction and an illustrative threshold.

  From A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI’s Dynamical Dark Energy Signal Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The target should not be read as an alternative-free or specification-independent result.

• The analysis fixes Planck-2018 background parameters and varies only the CPL dark-energy parameters w0 and wa.

  From A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI’s Dynamical Dark Energy Signal Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The target is conditional on the stated fixed background and two-parameter CPL setup.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
1d3cd401		6c5f1891

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	6c5f1891, ab7786cb, 785f6c92, 754ea8ec, 7c6ce0e2, 1b2dbb74

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
20164	APPENDED
20165	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20174	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
20193	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
22016	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
22812	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24327	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)