Evidence item
The reanalysis localizes evidence against ΛCDM to LRG2; removing it mildly favors ΛCDM, and seven-bin look-elsewhere correction removes the signal. DIRECT_TEXT
Source: A Sequentially-Valid Reanalysis of DESI’s Dynamical Dark Energy Signal · locator {} · excerpt hash sha256:841e4a1c5f6e6006c425cc14843164555360075d26add096a62ba8913d619f4c
Exact excerpt
However, evidence against the null is concentrated almost entirely in the LRG2 redshift bin and removing that bin reduces the running e-value to M = 0.49, mildly favouring ΛCDM. Furthermore, when the analysis allows for any of the seven DESI bins to have possibly produced the excess, the signal does not survive a look-elsewhere correction.
Linked claims
| Claim | Direction | Relevance | Steps | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a77b6958 | SUPPORT | DIRECT | 0 | yes |
Audits
None.