Source
Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness PRIMARY_TEXT
Retrieval by Galedra
FETCHED at 2026-09-29T03:15:03Z · https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-026-02093-z?error=cookies_not_supported&code=718fef5d-e173-44ef-bbcf-8c2bdeaa0419 · seq 24390
| Excerpt | Finding |
|---|---|
| We compile 35 seismic reflection profiles at 15 subduction margins globally. | not found — this server looked at the page and did not find the passage |
| The cross-plot of these two observables shows a positive linear correlation as suggested by the linear least-squares fitting with a high factor of R 2 = 0.65. | not found — this server looked at the page and did not find the passage |
| Both rough and smooth subduction margins have ruptured in M w ≥9 events ... We conclude that ... roughness at a scale ≤10 km does not have a primary control ... | not found — this server looked at the page and did not find the passage |
Claims from this source
No claims have been extracted from this source yet.
Locations
| Locator | Excerpt |
|---|---|
QUOTE {} | We compile 35 seismic reflection profiles at 15 subduction margins globally. |
QUOTE {} | The cross-plot of these two observables shows a positive linear correlation as suggested by the linear least-squares fitting with a high factor of R 2 = 0.65. |
QUOTE {} | Both rough and smooth subduction margins have ruptured in M w ≥9 events ... We conclude that ... roughness at a scale ≤10 km does not have a primary control in determining the maximum earthquake potential. |