Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study analyzed 2,243 children aged 3–23 months hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis, of whom 638 were ELISA-positive for rotavirus.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19434

a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 88 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 64, shared 23. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Vaccines · 1efd24fe Public health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:033f518f-a68c-882c-be01-fb75f189543b

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the size of the hospitalized-child analysis set and ELISA-positive subset. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports 2,243 hospitalized children aged 3–23 months and 638 ELISA-positive cases.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
d4e7e24737093cb8

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes37093cb8, 4afb4bde, 31f8d98b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the size of the hospitalized-child analysis set and ELISA-positive subset. 68631c56

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. d4e7e247

Qualifier: The reported 2,243 denominator and 638 ELISA-positive subset are restricted to a pooled hospital-based Indian surveillance network, a defined July 2019–December 2023 period, children aged 3–23 months, and a test-negative case-control analysis. ad8d034e

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:033f518f-a68c-882c-be01-fb75f189543b

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
19434APPENDED
19435ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19448LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24485TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25488TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)