Claim

In the study’s Indian hospital-based analysis, three ROTASIIL doses had estimated adjusted effectiveness of 88% against rotavirus-gastroenteritis hospitalization among children aged 3–5 months.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19426

Referenced 92 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 69, shared 22. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Vaccines · 1efd24fe Public health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:0a075e33-7e45-85ac-87b0-2f6f8a050ce7

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the age-specific adjusted effectiveness estimate for children aged 3–5 months. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 4 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:9feae34818856e83ad2acc1faeb6789a43745b0a5fbab70d18fea03f24cfecb8

Last changed at entry seq 25978; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
14f97a38 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (non directional)
9e7261c7 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	2.000000
be942af4 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (non directional)
531a3247 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (non directional)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 2.000000 (the counted weights) = 2.000000 → probability 0.8808

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8022 to 0.9309, a spread of 0.1287.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A 2026 Nature Communications test-negative case-control analysis in India estimated adjusted effectiveness of the three-dose ROTASIIL rotavirus vaccine...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The primary study reports the age-specific adjusted effectiveness estimate for children aged 3–5 months.

From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Primary vaccine-effectiveness estimate.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The passage reports 88% adjusted effectiveness after three doses among 3–5-month-olds, but does not state the Indian hospital-based analysis.

From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Dose count, effectiveness estimate, outcome, and age group are explicit; study-setting qualifier is absent.
The estimate comes from pooled observational test-negative case-control studies at 32 hospitals in seven Indian states during July 2019–December 2023.

From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The 88% figure is the highest age-specific adjusted effectiveness estimate, with a 53–97 confidence interval, among completed three-dose cases aged 3–5 months.

From Effectiveness of the oral rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL among children hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in India Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	14f97a38, 9e7261c7, be942af4, 531a3247

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the age-specific adjusted effectiveness estimate for children aged 3–5 months. 301348c8

Qualifier: The 88% figure is the highest age-specific adjusted effectiveness estimate, with a 53–97 confidence interval, among completed three-dose cases aged 3–5 months. c266de26

Qualifier: The estimate comes from pooled observational test-negative case-control studies at 32 hospitals in seven Indian states during July 2019–December 2023. 32a8a794

Qualifier: The passage reports 88% adjusted effectiveness after three doses among 3–5-month-olds, but does not state the Indian hospital-based analysis. c0df096e

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:0a075e33-7e45-85ac-87b0-2f6f8a050ce7

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19426	APPENDED
19427	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19444	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24776	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25977	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "0a075e33-7e45-85ac-87b0-2f6f8a050ce7",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "46372aa1-eaf2-858d-9ba4-726d14f97a38",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0edd1214-4630-8b80-bff3-d3b6c266de26",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "9ddbe537-960b-81ef-a4a5-ff3e9e7261c7",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "8a50fc0b-9087-85f7-9547-8f7f301348c8",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "a2a025d6-35c5-88a4-92f6-fabdbe942af4",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "43725a08-e462-817e-9677-221932a8a794",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "f751dd58-40c4-89dc-a114-e364531a3247",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "812680ce-6a52-8f2b-9406-0557c0df096e",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1287",
    "permissive": "0.9309",
    "conservative": "0.8022"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8808",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "2.000000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25978,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "46372aa1-eaf2-858d-9ba4-726d14f97a38",
        "9ddbe537-960b-81ef-a4a5-ff3e9e7261c7",
        "a2a025d6-35c5-88a4-92f6-fabdbe942af4",
        "f751dd58-40c4-89dc-a114-e364531a3247"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.000000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 4
}