Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: OpenAI said no specific user data was accessed for solving, but could not rule out de-identified product data helping improve models. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Evidence for

• The article quotes OpenAI's September 8 announcement: it cannot rule out that de-identified product usage data helped improve its models.

  From OpenAI Navier-Stokes Dispute: Who Can Read Your Prompts? Read 2026-09-22 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Verbatim match to the claim.

• OpenAI said no specific user data was accessed for solving, but could not rule out de-identified product data helping improve models.

  From Some thoughts on the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The quoted passage directly states both parts of the claim.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• OpenAI separated direct use in solving the problem from a general possibility that de-identified product data improved its models.

  From Some thoughts on the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem Read 2026-09-28 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The disclaimer does not say product-usage data influenced this specific solution; it distinguishes no specific user data accessed for solving from a general possible model-improvement effect.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

From	Relationship	To
2785f850	NARROWS	0491ac36
7c6c0575	NARROWS	2785f850

Review checklist

Review checks: 2 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	yes	a0310f59
opposing search done	yes	b7a06a52
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
5426	APPENDED
5427	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
6682	TASK_RESULT	by 8b5e81bf (accepted)
7760	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
7772	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)