Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe Health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The trial found no significant active-versus-sham difference at day five or in secondary outcomes and reported good tolerability. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The packet directly supports the randomized sample, null day-five and secondary outcomes, and good tolerability.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “In a triple-blind multicenter randomized trial of 132 patients with persistent schizophrenia symptoms, low-intensity transcranial random-noise stimulation...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The trial found no significant active-versus-sham difference at day five or in secondary outcomes and reported good tolerability.

  From Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for schizophrenia: a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multicenter trial (STIM’Zo) Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The packet directly supports the randomized sample, null day-five and secondary outcomes, and good tolerability.

  From Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for schizophrenia: a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multicenter trial (STIM’Zo) Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The counted passage reports 64 and 68 patients by arm and the clinical outcomes, but omits the total 132-patient denominator and triple-blind multicenter design.

  From Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation for schizophrenia: a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multicenter trial (STIM’Zo) Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  The passage supports the reported outcomes and tolerability but is narrower on trial design and overall denominator.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
e1ca5cc4		72fb4b00

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	cef71919, 72fb4b00, 884b1f02

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
17950	APPENDED
17951	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
17956	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
17985	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25373	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)