Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Under the CMIP5-RCP2.6 climate-change scenario, the study forecast metabolic-rate increases of up to 26.6% in aquatic invertebrates and 43.9% in terrestrial invertebrates.

Type FORECAST · truth-evaluable: no (UNRESOLVED_FORECAST) · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 14370 · qualifiers {"baseline":"Percent increases are relative to the study's modeled baseline.","sampling":"Forecasts derive from the study's assembled meta-analytic dataset and model.","time_range":"Scenario forecast horizon is the horizon modeled by the study; the abstract does not specify it."}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 53 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 26, shared 25. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Science · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Not assessed

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability n/a

This is a forecast that has not resolved yet.

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:2c343430-55d5-8391-bb55-3d71b1ffe782

Not yet independently audited.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes765bbb61, 944e7302, 32940f56

Summary

Not assessed. This is a forecast that has not resolved yet. coverage:2c343430-55d5-8391-bb55-3d71b1ffe782

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:2c343430-55d5-8391-bb55-3d71b1ffe782

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
14370APPENDED
14371ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
14378LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
14689TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20513LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)