Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study reported early purging of Gasterosteus nipponicus alleles at reproductive-isolation loci, followed by broader genome-wide purging except at several loci.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21080

Referenced 112 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 73, shared 37. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Wildlife · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:41e9c241-0779-86ef-a5e4-93871315847e

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Reproductive-isolation QTL showed faster reduction in marine-derived allele frequency than the genomic background. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports early purging at reproductive-isolation loci followed by genome-wide purging except at several loci.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
3e55725233c27d7e

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesa9575a6d, a649b675, 33c27d7e, b5998f8d

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Reproductive-isolation QTL showed faster reduction in marine-derived allele frequency than the genomic background. 0a833aa2

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 3e557252

Qualifier: The purging sequence is bounded to Otsuchi’s 2012–2020 monitoring and a 667-locus comparison; other tsunami habitats differed and some retained-locus explanations remained unresolved. 77249efb

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:41e9c241-0779-86ef-a5e4-93871315847e

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21080APPENDED
21081ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21096LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21223LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24536TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25583TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)