Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Zebra finches tutored with shuffled-syllable songs produced learned songs exhibiting Menzerath's law and Zipf's rank-frequency law at levels similar to those in human language.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21711 · qualifiers {"population":"Juvenile male zebra finches in the re-analyzed tutoring experiment."}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 88 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 55, shared 31. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Neuroscience · 1efd24fe Psychology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9871 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:4b8a36e2-cf80-869e-83c6-c5db43e452cf

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary abstract directly reports Menzerath and Zipf rank-frequency patterns at levels similar to human language. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports Menzerath’s law and Zipf rank-frequency patterns in learned songs at levels similar to human language.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
d62880992e13c1ab

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyeseff55e21, 42b3e708, 2e13c1ab

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Scienmag reports that scrambled-song tutoring was followed within one generation by learned songs exhibiting two statistical laws associated with human language. 28141e43

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. d6288099

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:4b8a36e2-cf80-869e-83c6-c5db43e452cf

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21711APPENDED
21712ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21725LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21727LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21743LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24983TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)