Claim

PROTECTconfirm randomized 1,793 students in 44 Baden-Württemberg secondary schools to four weekly 90-minute sessions of CBT-based PROTECTtraining or structurally parallel media-literacy PROTECTinfo.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23569 · qualifiers {"location":"Baden-Württemberg, Germany","population":"Secondary-school students; 1,793 randomized within 90 classes","time_range":"July 1, 2020 to August 31, 2024"}

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 116 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 82, shared 33. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:6d350c9c-dc01-866c-aa79-eba68f7b5ff4

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract describes 44 German secondary schools, 1,793 randomized students, and four weekly 90-minute sessions for each program. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly supports the 44-school Baden-Württemberg setting, individual randomization, four weekly 90-minute sessions, CBT-based PROTECTtraining, and structurally parallel media-literacy PROTECTinfo, but it does not state the 1,793-student count.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A 2026 randomized clinical trial compared CBT-based PROTECTtraining with a structurally parallel media-literacy program in German secondary-school students,...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The abstract describes 44 German secondary schools, 1,793 randomized students, and four weekly 90-minute sessions for each program.

From Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Media Literacy for Prevention of Gaming Disorder and Unspecified Internet Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The quoted passage directly supports the 44-school Baden-Württemberg setting, individual randomization, four weekly 90-minute sessions, CBT-based PROTECTtraining, and structurally parallel media-literacy PROTECTinfo, but it does not state the 1,793-student count.

From Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Media Literacy for Prevention of Gaming Disorder and Unspecified Internet Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

All design elements except the numerical sample size appear in the excerpt.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
dee68710		a17d855e

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	c8ff7674, a17d855e

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract describes 44 German secondary schools, 1,793 randomized students, and four weekly 90-minute sessions for each program. 84b1eb75

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. dee68710

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:6d350c9c-dc01-866c-aa79-eba68f7b5ff4

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
23569	APPENDED
23570	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23587	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24624	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)