Claim

In a randomized trial of 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation, both brochure-based and web telerehabilitation home exercise improved most outcomes; baseline-adjusted analyses favored telerehabilitation for activity-related pain and dynamic lumbar muscle performance, but not overall superiority.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 18358

37 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 91 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 72, shared 18. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Medicine · 1efd24fe Health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:85cc560a-5fd2-8eb3-aaff-6cfb6149dc20

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from link.springer.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: Both programs improved most outcomes, while adjusted analyses found selected telerehabilitation advantages rather than overall superiority. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports randomization, improvements in both groups, adjusted telerehabilitation advantages, and no overall superiority.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“In a randomized trial of 46 patients with lumbar disc herniation, both brochure-based and web telerehabilitation home exercise improved most outcomes;...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

Both programs improved most outcomes, while adjusted analyses found selected telerehabilitation advantages rather than overall superiority.

From Development of a telerehabilitation-based exercise and monitoring program and its effectiveness compared with a brochure-based home exercise program in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The passage directly reports randomization, improvements in both groups, adjusted telerehabilitation advantages, and no overall superiority.

From Development of a telerehabilitation-based exercise and monitoring program and its effectiveness compared with a brochure-based home exercise program in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The result is a four-week, two-arm trial of 46 eligible participants with an important baseline imbalance and outcome-specific adjusted advantages; the 91% adherence figure is for the telerehabilitation group, not both groups.

From Development of a telerehabilitation-based exercise and monitoring program and its effectiveness compared with a brochure-based home exercise program in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Clarifies duration, group denominators, baseline imbalance, nonsignificant endpoints, adjusted-outcome scope, and adherence denominator.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
3ca743de		ad8101f9

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	ad8101f9, c687c03b, 761f7c98

Summary

Supported. The main support is: Both programs improved most outcomes, while adjusted analyses found selected telerehabilitation advantages rather than overall superiority. ba7456db

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 3ca743de

Qualifier: The result is a four-week, two-arm trial of 46 eligible participants with an important baseline imbalance and outcome-specific adjusted advantages; the 91% adherence figure is for the telerehabilitation group, not both groups. 7aed770a

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:85cc560a-5fd2-8eb3-aaff-6cfb6149dc20

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
18358	APPENDED
18359	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18364	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
18408	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25442	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)