Claim

In a corpus of 100 computational-biology papers, Paper2Agent successfully agentified 74 papers and produced 599 proposed tools, of which 593 passed automated validation.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22865

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 128 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 102, shared 24. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

AI · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.6128 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:89b10a4c-74db-80da-82ab-961ccd80790d

Not yet independently audited.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: A public release summary repeats that 74 of 100 computational-biology papers were agentified and 593 of 599 proposed tools passed validation. weight 0.459000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The supplied passage directly reports 74 of 100 papers agentified, 599 proposed tools, and 593 passing automated validation.; The primary Nature article reports successful agentification of 74 of 100 computational-biology papers, yielding 599 proposed tools with 593 passing automated validation.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Contradicted.

Hide calculation

0.6128 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Leans supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 4 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:2984e32b220b315067aa7fc6418d98118f587683d44cbbb18ab86cf06fca426b

Last changed at entry seq 24381; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
2c96ec9a support	relevance MODERATE 0.6 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.459000	0.459000
7871ecf6 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DATASET_RESULT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000
ded8b448 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 7871ecf6)
4191a68a support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance SELF 0.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.000000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 7871ecf6)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.459000 (the counted weights) = 0.459000 → probability 0.6128

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.5796 to 0.6449, a spread of 0.0653.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“In a corpus of 100 computational-biology papers, Paper2Agent successfully agentified 74 papers and produced 599 proposed tools, of which 593 passed automated...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“The Nature study evaluated Paper2Agent across heterogeneous paper corpora and execution benchmarks: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11044-y” · 4 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The study reports 74 of 100 computational-biology papers successfully agentified, with 593 of 599 proposed tools passing automated validation.

From Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The supplied passage directly reports 74 of 100 papers agentified, 599 proposed tools, and 593 passing automated validation.

From Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The excerpt exactly states all four quantitative values.
A public release summary repeats that 74 of 100 computational-biology papers were agentified and 593 of 599 proposed tools passed validation.

From Stanford Researchers Release Paper2Agent: Turning Research Papers Into AI Agents That Reproduce Results and Run on New Data Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 1 Counted

Public release summary corroborates the counts but is secondary to the paper.
The primary Nature article reports successful agentification of 74 of 100 computational-biology papers, yielding 599 proposed tools with 593 passing automated validation.

From Reimagining research papers as interactive and reliable AI agents Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The source directly states every quantity in the claim.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
e4d41237		7871ecf6
b2fda252		7871ecf6

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	7871ecf6, ded8b448, 4191a68a

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: A public release summary repeats that 74 of 100 computational-biology papers were agentified and 593 of 599 proposed tools passed validation. 1cdb1223

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. e4d41237b2fda252

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. c521add9

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:89b10a4c-74db-80da-82ab-961ccd80790d

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
22865	APPENDED
22866	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22889	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
22921	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
22940	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24380	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "89b10a4c-74db-80da-82ab-961ccd80790d",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "4a08b723-8431-8329-afb8-c5472c96ec9a",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "8018c34e-c906-8e98-bfdd-2bd31cdb1223",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.459000",
      "relevance": "MODERATE",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SOCIAL_POST",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.459000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "link": "8ef1fa0d-d5da-8add-852c-a24e7871ecf6",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "9db40c90-b501-81ee-8588-866fd6903dd7",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "DATASET_RESULT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "8ef1fa0d-d5da-8add-852c-a24e7871ecf6",
      "link": "b9be5099-566c-8a1d-b231-7b4dded8b448",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "93a5b383-b3d8-861f-80dd-7ed7e4d41237",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "8ef1fa0d-d5da-8add-852c-a24e7871ecf6",
      "link": "be9935dd-11dd-87e6-a793-750f4191a68a",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "d8762741-5000-8095-a7e5-7e0db2fda252",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "SELF",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0653",
    "permissive": "0.6449",
    "conservative": "0.5796"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.6128",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.459000",
  "snapshot_seq": 24381,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "LEANS_SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "8ef1fa0d-d5da-8add-852c-a24e7871ecf6",
        "b9be5099-566c-8a1d-b231-7b4dded8b448",
        "be9935dd-11dd-87e6-a793-750f4191a68a"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.459000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 4
}