Claim

In two reported experiments on dark cultural heritage communication, advertising appeal type affected willingness to support heritage preservation through emotional arousal and self-construal, with effects that were not fully consistent across verbal and behavioral outcomes.

Type CAUSAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 15751 · qualifiers {"time_range":"Data collected December 14, 2024-July 4, 2025","source_edition":"2bca6a50-9a38-83a9-bba1-061b046d76e0"}

35 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 101 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 71, shared 29. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Entertainment · 1efd24fe Media · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9517 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability LOW

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:95d96414-5ef1-8c31-bc43-b099c4ec234c

Not yet independently audited.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study reports that advertising appeal type affected preservation-support willingness through emotional arousal and self-construal, with inconsistent verbal and behavioral effects. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports an appeal-type effect mediated by emotional arousal and self-construal, with inconsistent verbal and behavioral outcomes.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Hide calculation

0.9517 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability LOW · 3 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:6663d29de2d1fe38a2ddec63808ab5d8cc65fb4ffb91e6b904684c7b35595da2

Last changed at entry seq 15774; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
4d511307 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
7ec9ef9c support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 4d511307)
a1edc4e6 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000

prior 0.35 → log-odds -0.619039 + 3.600000 (the counted weights) = 2.980961 → probability 0.9517

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8700 to 0.9831, a spread of 0.1131.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A September 2026 study of dark cultural heritage communication found that advertising appeal type affected preservation-support willingness through emotional...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The study reports that advertising appeal type affected preservation-support willingness through emotional arousal and self-construal, with inconsistent verbal and behavioral effects.

From Dark heritage tourism education: effects of information-led versus narrative-led advertising appeals on tourists’ heritage preservation intentions Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The study reports a serial pathway from emotional engagement through identity positioning to commitment to responsibility.

From Dark heritage tourism education: effects of information-led versus narrative-led advertising appeals on tourists’ heritage preservation intentions Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The passage directly reports an appeal-type effect mediated by emotional arousal and self-construal, with inconsistent verbal and behavioral outcomes.

From Dark heritage tourism education: effects of information-led versus narrative-led advertising appeals on tourists’ heritage preservation intentions Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
7d7dd26b		4d511307

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	4d511307, 7ec9ef9c, a1edc4e6

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study reports that advertising appeal type affected preservation-support willingness through emotional arousal and self-construal, with inconsistent verbal and behavioral effects. 916d1c5b

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 7d7dd26b

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. db813d55

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:95d96414-5ef1-8c31-bc43-b099c4ec234c

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
15751	APPENDED
15752	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15759	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
15761	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
15765	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "95d96414-5ef1-8c31-bc43-b099c4ec234c",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "546eed71-b568-82e7-ba22-aa014d511307",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "9d664fc2-5c9a-89d0-bc6c-cee6916d1c5b",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "546eed71-b568-82e7-ba22-aa014d511307",
      "link": "ad98477b-3074-8bd6-91fa-85b67ec9ef9c",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "e48180d7-e413-8724-816d-81197d7dd26b",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "c834dff7-aecf-8623-bc46-e3bea1edc4e6",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "cec3dc1b-8351-894f-82c5-88d3d9238ac7",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.35",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1131",
    "permissive": "0.9831",
    "conservative": "0.8700"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "LOW",
  "claim_type": "CAUSAL",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9517",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "3.600000",
  "snapshot_seq": 15774,
  "prior_log_odds": "-0.619039",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": true,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "546eed71-b568-82e7-ba22-aa014d511307",
        "ad98477b-3074-8bd6-91fa-85b67ec9ef9c",
        "c834dff7-aecf-8623-bc46-e3bea1edc4e6"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.980961",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}