Claim
The study analyzed direct plate-interface observations from 35 seismic-reflection profiles at 15 global subduction margins, measuring roughness over 1–10 km scales and comparing it with maximum observed earthquake size at sampled sites; the authors note that further 3D observations are needed before generalizing across all global subduction zones.
48 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluableTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:af72326d-9b42-831f-a5ff-e693b161b5db
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The study quantified roughness parameters over 1–10 km length scales on 35 plate-boundary faults. weight 2.000000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Evidence for
-
From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly supports the profile and margin denominators.
-
From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly supports the measurement scale.
-
From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Directly supports the stated limitation on generalization.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
None.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| b161b5db | NARROWS | ab73a89c |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | 87164727, 5b4e7ae4, 31627033 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The study quantified roughness parameters over 1–10 km length scales on 35 plate-boundary faults. 6f6667ec
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 7941ac9e
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:af72326d-9b42-831f-a5ff-e693b161b5db
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 25515 | APPENDED | |
| 25516 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 25521 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |