Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The study’s scenario estimates that 2.66 million hectares of wetlands would need restoration by 2030 across the EEA38.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22725

Referenced 116 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 88, shared 26. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Environment · 1efd24fe Policy · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.7146 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:ca1986c4-73d9-8785-b60e-a412a12f8353

Not yet independently audited.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: A secondary report independently describes the researchers’ approximately 2.66-million-hectare 2030 restoration scenario and its non-legal status. weight 0.918000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly states the 2.66-million-hectare EEA38 restoration estimate for 2030.; The primary Nature article reports a scenario estimate of 2.66 million hectares of wetlands needing restoration by 2030 across the EEA38.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Leans contradicted.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
3006a68ed1f8b840
894b55cad1f8b840

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes5e260224, d1f8b840, 6a1c7810

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: A secondary report independently describes the researchers’ approximately 2.66-million-hectare 2030 restoration scenario and its non-legal status. 6d592108

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 3006a68e894b55ca

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. c8222964

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:ca1986c4-73d9-8785-b60e-a412a12f8353

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
22725APPENDED
22726ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22739LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22755LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22770TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24374TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)