Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports no significant total-sample or secondary-outcome differences between the programs. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage reports no significant total-sample severity difference and no significant secondary-outcome differences between PROTECTtraining and PROTECTinfo.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A 2026 randomized clinical trial compared CBT-based PROTECTtraining with a structurally parallel media-literacy program in German secondary-school students,...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The abstract reports no significant total-sample or secondary-outcome differences between the programs.

  From Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Media Literacy for Prevention of Gaming Disorder and Unspecified Internet Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The passage reports no significant total-sample severity difference and no significant secondary-outcome differences between PROTECTtraining and PROTECTinfo.

  From Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Media Literacy for Prevention of Gaming Disorder and Unspecified Internet Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Total sample, 12-month comparison, and secondary-outcome null findings match.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
147b5bd1		e6e64d53

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	e6e64d53, fa9c3b73

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
23577	APPENDED
23578	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23591	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24917	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)