Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the reported study, flexible perovskite solar devices achieved 25.13% efficiency, while a 655.2 cm² submodule achieved 22.60% efficiency (certified 21.07%).

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 15129 · qualifiers {"population":"Reported flexible perovskite solar devices and submodule","denominator":"Device and submodule efficiency as reported"}

a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 87 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 66, shared 20. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Energy · 1efd24fe Chemistry · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:e5001811-11a1-8cc5-aa01-c28b1251441c

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports 25.13% flexible-device efficiency and 22.60% submodule efficiency for a 655.2 cm² submodule, with 21.07% certification. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports 25.13% flexible-device efficiency and 22.60% efficiency for a 655.2 cm² submodule, certified at 21.07%.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 2 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:0ca6b389bf4b4bfc0fe847eec4ce2f925bc248b635a6bbe69be2233824016eea

Last changed at entry seq 15152; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
d1615a8c support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 2.000000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept be8992ee)
be8992ee support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 2.000000 2.000000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 2.000000 (the counted weights) = 2.000000 → probability 0.8808

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8022 to 0.9309, a spread of 0.1287.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
f281ccb5be8992ee

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd1615a8c, be8992ee

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports 25.13% flexible-device efficiency and 22.60% submodule efficiency for a 655.2 cm² submodule, with 21.07% certification. eda98156

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. f281ccb5

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:e5001811-11a1-8cc5-aa01-c28b1251441c

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
15129APPENDED
15130ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
15141LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
15145TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "e5001811-11a1-8cc5-aa01-c28b1251441c",
  "links": [
    {
      "kept": "faed7140-6009-89d5-acf0-1e92be8992ee",
      "link": "a6cb040c-9823-85d3-ae8b-4f63d1615a8c",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "e1d67224-d360-8fb9-a773-d665f281ccb5",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "faed7140-6009-89d5-acf0-1e92be8992ee",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "b11b7ef9-55e0-8aae-bdb7-11f0eda98156",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1287",
    "permissive": "0.9309",
    "conservative": "0.8022"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8808",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "2.000000",
  "snapshot_seq": 15152,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "a6cb040c-9823-85d3-ae8b-4f63d1615a8c",
        "faed7140-6009-89d5-acf0-1e92be8992ee"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.000000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 2
}