Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

ArmA is a glycosyl hydrolase specific for archaeal peptidoglycan, and the study found that it cleaves archaeal cell-wall material at the site of methanogen cell division.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20113 · qualifiers {"location":"archaeal peptidoglycan and methanogen cell-division sites","population":"Methanobrevibacter smithii and diverse methanogens"}

26 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 88 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 87, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Chemistry · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Insufficient evidence

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability n/a

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:f7849ae1-1fb5-8380-a5d8-e0f7dd4e9792

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Suppressed as dependent: The packet directly identifies ArmA as archaeal-PG-specific and reports its cleavage activity at the cell-division site.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Insufficient evidence to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
893dc5591ae05f8d

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesf59d2736, 1ae05f8d, fd6e0041

Summary

Insufficient evidence. No counted evidence bears on this claim yet. coverage:f7849ae1-1fb5-8380-a5d8-e0f7dd4e9792

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 893dc559

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. fd039946

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:f7849ae1-1fb5-8380-a5d8-e0f7dd4e9792

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
20113APPENDED
20114ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20119LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20121TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24323TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)