Claim

In a six-month randomized trial, the medically tailored-groceries plus telehealth intervention group had a larger HbA1c decrease than the usual-care group, 0.66 versus 0.44 percentage points.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22496 · qualifiers {"location":"United States; Medicaid-insured adults with persistently elevated blood sugar.","time_range":"Six months."}

26 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 134 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 102, shared 31. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Nutrition · 1efd24fe Medicine · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Unresolved

Score: 0.5498 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 0 counted · 2 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 0 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:1e575b57-ed5c-846a-be80-883de1a581dd

Not yet independently audited.Evidence points both ways.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The report gives six-month HbA1c decreases of 0.66 percentage points with the intervention and 0.44 with usual care. weight 2.000000 evidence

Strongest counted contradiction: The trial briefing reports a 0.66-point intervention decrease versus 0.25 points in usual care, contradicting the claim’s 0.44-point comparator. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports six-month HbA1c decreases of 0.66 points for intervention and 0.44 for usual care.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Unresolved to Contradicted.

Hide calculation

0.5498 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Unresolved · Review checks: 0 of 4 · stability HIGH · 3 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:b5d61853251ce55a065988f2a3096af6aeeefd905dc22bc19ab3d19862cdd0ae

Last changed at entry seq 25980; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
785d2d37 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	2.000000
c9f0f56c contradict	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
2361e66e support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 785d2d37)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 0.200000 (the counted weights) = 0.200000 → probability 0.5498

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.5349 to 0.5646, a spread of 0.0297.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A randomized trial report said medically tailored groceries plus telehealth counseling improved six-month HbA1c and diabetes-control rates versus usual care...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The report gives six-month HbA1c decreases of 0.66 percentage points with the intervention and 0.44 with usual care.

From Trial shows that medically tailored groceries lower blood sugar in type 2 diabetes Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The quoted passage directly reports six-month HbA1c decreases of 0.66 points for intervention and 0.44 for usual care.

From Trial shows that medically tailored groceries lower blood sugar in type 2 diabetes Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The excerpt states both treatment values and the six-month interval.

Evidence against

The trial briefing reports a 0.66-point intervention decrease versus 0.25 points in usual care, contradicting the claim’s 0.44-point comparator.

From Medically tailored groceries lower HbA1c in type 2 diabetes Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The intervention decrease matches, but the usual-care comparator differs; the reported net treatment difference is 0.40 points.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
3752d4e1		785d2d37

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Unresolved. The main support is: The report gives six-month HbA1c decreases of 0.66 percentage points with the intervention and 0.44 with usual care. 377a0bf6

Against that, contradiction: The trial briefing reports a 0.66-point intervention decrease versus 0.25 points in usual care, contradicting the claim’s 0.44-point comparator. a6dc2465

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 3752d4e1

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. a293b708

Review checks: 0 of 4. coverage:1e575b57-ed5c-846a-be80-883de1a581dd

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
22496	APPENDED
22497	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22514	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24439	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25979	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "1e575b57-ed5c-846a-be80-883de1a581dd",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "2dd4900e-4554-8f2e-ad1c-78db785d2d37",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "99b7b061-8044-8b8a-b886-d73f377a0bf6",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "904b0758-cb8d-8b7d-a429-4146c9f0f56c",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "774279f0-1ec1-8216-98ec-a953a6dc2465",
      "direction": "CONTRADICT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "2dd4900e-4554-8f2e-ad1c-78db785d2d37",
      "link": "a2090309-8e8b-84c1-afe9-24ba2361e66e",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "ecb2cc9b-c0a7-8319-bef3-7d263752d4e1",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0297",
    "permissive": "0.5646",
    "conservative": "0.5349"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": true,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.5498",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "0.200000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25980,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.00",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "UNRESOLVED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 1,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "0.200000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}