Claim

In a two-arm randomized trial, a 5-week One Step Back psychological-decentering program was compared with an active physical-and-cognitive-exercise control among 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 23531 · qualifiers {"location":"UK secondary schools","population":"Adolescents at risk of depression; n=114; mean age 16.8 years; 84% female","time_range":"May 2021 to November 2022"}

28 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 135 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 98, shared 36. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:23e63732-8afc-85fa-8d57-a4226d66292c

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports a two-arm 5-week trial of One Step Back versus active control in 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports the two-arm randomized five-week One Step Back versus active physical-and-cognitive exercise control trial in 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A 2026 report describes a 5-week digitally embedded One Step Back psychological-decentering trial in UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression,...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The abstract reports a two-arm 5-week trial of One Step Back versus active control in 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression.

From A digitally embedded intervention to enhance psychological decentering and reduce depression severity in at-risk adolescents: a randomised controlled trial of the ‘One Step Back’ programme Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The quoted passage directly reports the two-arm randomized five-week One Step Back versus active physical-and-cognitive exercise control trial in 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression.

From A digitally embedded intervention to enhance psychological decentering and reduce depression severity in at-risk adolescents: a randomised controlled trial of the ‘One Step Back’ programme Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The excerpt explicitly states design, duration, intervention, control, population, setting, and sample size.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
ddcafe9d		bd3b41d5

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	50af7654, bd3b41d5

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports a two-arm 5-week trial of One Step Back versus active control in 114 UK secondary-school adolescents at risk of depression. 56a3a883

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. ddcafe9d

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:23e63732-8afc-85fa-8d57-a4226d66292c

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
23531	APPENDED
23532	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
23549	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24622	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)