Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the study, deleting RANKL in lymphoid tissue organizer cells caused an almost complete absence of Thetis-cell subset TC I.

Type CAUSAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21532

Referenced 122 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 78, shared 42. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Leans supported

Score: 0.7991 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability LOW

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:25b113b7-5291-8c83-ae78-4c9356873231

Not yet independently audited.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports selective loss of TC I after RANKL deletion in organizer cells. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The primary Nature study reports selective loss of Thetis-cell subset TC I after RANKL deletion in lymphoid tissue organizer cells.; The passage directly states that RANKL ablation in LTo cells led to an almost complete absence of TC I.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Leans supported to Leans contradicted.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
d30ef209913c6e15
ae79a435913c6e15

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes913c6e15, 3a48db24, 06be1451

Summary

Leans supported. The main support is: The primary study reports selective loss of TC I after RANKL deletion in organizer cells. 97071fd7

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. d30ef209ae79a435

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 3df37cd5

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:25b113b7-5291-8c83-ae78-4c9356873231

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21532APPENDED
21533ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21546LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21632LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24119TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)