Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Nutrition · 1efd24fe Medicine · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The report describes 460 Medicaid-insured U.S. adults with persistently elevated blood sugar, mostly using insulin. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly reports 460 US adults insured with Medicaid and experiencing persistently elevated blood sugar, with approximately two-thirds using insulin.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed, primary source reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A randomized trial report said medically tailored groceries plus telehealth counseling improved six-month HbA1c and diabetes-control rates versus usual care...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The report describes 460 Medicaid-insured U.S. adults with persistently elevated blood sugar, mostly using insulin.

  From Trial shows that medically tailored groceries lower blood sugar in type 2 diabetes Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The excerpt directly reports 460 US adults insured with Medicaid and experiencing persistently elevated blood sugar, with approximately two-thirds using insulin.

  From Trial shows that medically tailored groceries lower blood sugar in type 2 diabetes Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The passage exactly matches the trial size, U.S. Medicaid population, blood-sugar criterion, and insulin proportion.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
1cc4deaa		94bbfa45

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 0 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author. No independent review yet. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	no

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
22504	APPENDED
22505	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22518	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24231	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)