Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

Across flatworms and vertebrates, hundreds of accessibility-dictating DNA motifs formed conserved vocabularies associated with particular cell-type families, and models trained in one species could predict family-level chromatin accessibility in distant species.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20737 · qualifiers {"scope":"Comparative single-nucleus multi-omic and deep-learning study of flatworms and vertebrates."}

31 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 114 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 66, shared 46. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Science · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9955 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 6 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:4097f99b-81f8-8929-a1f3-65d41f7daac4

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from scienmag.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary Nature Ecology & Evolution abstract reports hundreds of conserved motif vocabularies associated with cell-type families and accurate cross-species family-level chromatin-accessibility prediction by models trained in one species. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The abstract directly reports conserved motif vocabularies, family-level cross-species prediction, and the compared flatworm and vertebrate datasets.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
adfd5470932304e8

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes5d0b9e35, b0111d41, 981a47b5, 932304e8, 88f2674b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary Nature Ecology & Evolution abstract reports hundreds of conserved motif vocabularies associated with cell-type families and accurate cross-species family-level chromatin-accessibility prediction by models trained in one species. 265697e5

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. adfd5470

Qualifier: The primary article identifies three flatworm libraries—Macrostomum, planarian and schistosome—in its quality-control description. c74a666e

Qualifier: The cross-species analyses use selected flatworm comparisons plus mouse and zebrafish neural datasets, rather than all vertebrates. f7b8f9a0

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 65e5b4a0

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:4097f99b-81f8-8929-a1f3-65d41f7daac4

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
20737APPENDED
20738ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20749LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20765LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22030TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
23009TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24351TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)