Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Earth science · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports its global profile and margin sample. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage supports 35 profiles across 15 global subduction margins, but does not state the comparison’s analytical purpose.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A global analysis of 15 subduction zones examined whether plate-interface roughness predicts earthquake magnitude and whether interface coupling tracks...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports its global profile and margin sample.

  From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary dataset description.

• The quoted passage supports 35 profiles across 15 global subduction margins, but does not state the comparison’s analytical purpose.

  From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  It directly supports the sample size and geographic scope only.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The counted passage establishes the profile count and global subduction-margin coverage but omits the stated comparison of interface roughness with earthquake potential.

  From Maximum earthquake magnitude unlikely to be controlled by subduction interface roughness Read 2026-09-29 Relevance MODERATE Steps 0 Counted

  The passage supports the dataset composition and geographic scope but is narrower on the analytical purpose.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
75e19669		483558b4

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	483558b4, bd7bf44a, a40f2e55

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19654	APPENDED
19655	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19672	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24493	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25511	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)