Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The yolk-sac-origin statement is atlas-based support from paired single-nuclei RNA/ATAC and spatial data collected across human cranial meningeal development at 6–21 post-conception weeks; it is not presented here as direct lineage tracing across all development.

Type INTERPRETIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25721

35 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 90 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 90, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability LOW

Main unresolved issue: 1 counted evidence item has no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:6836e7f8-243e-8f6b-ad9b-0231aed2f1d4

Not yet independently audited.This assessment depends heavily on modeling choices.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The human meningeal atlas directly supports a yolk-sac-origin interpretation using paired single-nuclei and spatial data sampled from 17 donors across 6–21 post-conception weeks. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
aed2f1d4NARROWSdef9e18a

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd7d85156

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The human meningeal atlas directly supports a yolk-sac-origin interpretation using paired single-nuclei and spatial data sampled from 17 donors across 6–21 post-conception weeks. bca08741

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 1d967a07

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:6836e7f8-243e-8f6b-ad9b-0231aed2f1d4

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
25721APPENDED
25722ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25727TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)