Claim

In a randomized crossover study of ten participants, broken-cell chickpea meals produced early gastrointestinal glucose and maltose peaks associated with rapid GIP responses, whereas intact-cell meals elevated duodenal amino acids and ileal nutrients associated with enhanced GLP-1 and PYY responses.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 18836 · qualifiers {"population":"Ten participants consuming chickpea-based meals with intact versus broken cellular structures."}

40 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 119 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 70, shared 47. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Nutrition · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9487 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7885cf5e-5b80-8afa-a019-2d58603e3f97

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from spiral.imperial.ac.uk was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports contrasting GIP versus GLP-1/PYY-associated metabolite responses after broken-cell versus intact-cell chickpea meals. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly reports the ten-person randomized comparison, early glucose/maltose-GIP response after broken-cell meals, and intact-cell nutrient-associated GLP-1/PYY responses.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Hide calculation

0.9487 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability HIGH · 4 sources, 2 independent lineages

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:9726a43f815b88f3cde0f1d487f25ec176cbc80c9cc14c6f407234151b99080f

Last changed at entry seq 25912; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
55d0b810 qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (non directional)
cef1c662 support	relevance STRONG 1.2 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 1 step, 1 − 0.15 × 1 0.850000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	0.918000	0.918000
29528dbc support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 7e108da9)
7e108da9 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	2.000000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 2.918000 (the counted weights) = 2.918000 → probability 0.9487

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8852 to 0.9780, a spread of 0.0928.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“In a randomized crossover study of ten participants, broken-cell chickpea meals produced early gastrointestinal glucose and maltose peaks associated with...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
“In a randomized crossover study of ten participants, intact versus broken chickpea cellular structures produced different gastrointestinal metabolite and...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The abstract reports contrasting GIP versus GLP-1/PYY-associated metabolite responses after broken-cell versus intact-cell chickpea meals.

From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
The Imperial repository abstract corroborates the ten-participant crossover comparison and its contrasting GIP versus GLP-1/PYY-associated responses to broken-cell and intact-cell chickpea meals.

From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the gut metabolome and microbiome: A randomised cross over trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance STRONG Steps 1 Counted

Institutional repository copy of the same study; corroborating source, not an independent participant sample.
The quoted passage directly reports the ten-person randomized comparison, early glucose/maltose-GIP response after broken-cell meals, and intact-cell nutrient-associated GLP-1/PYY responses.

From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

The excerpt states sample size, design, meal structures, metabolites, and hormone associations.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The meal-structure findings came from ten healthy young adults in a three-phase gastrointestinal sampling protocol, limiting generalization to broader populations.

From Effect of dietary chickpea structures on the small intestine metabolome and microbiome: a randomised crossover trial Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
3a584153		7e108da9

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	55d0b810, 29528dbc, 7e108da9

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The Imperial repository abstract corroborates the ten-participant crossover comparison and its contrasting GIP versus GLP-1/PYY-associated responses to broken-cell and intact-cell chickpea meals. 0f697778

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 3a584153

Qualifier: The meal-structure findings came from ten healthy young adults in a three-phase gastrointestinal sampling protocol, limiting generalization to broader populations. 73efb3bf

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7885cf5e-5b80-8afa-a019-2d58603e3f97

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
18836	APPENDED
18837	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18848	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
18868	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24728	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25911	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "7885cf5e-5b80-8afa-a019-2d58603e3f97",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "884de0c1-64da-8cbc-9e3c-a57a55d0b810",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "5ac20353-508d-8f2a-93a2-317773efb3bf",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "9b9b0c4d-3345-8dd5-b5d3-c66dcef1c662",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "be45217d-2835-8432-a1c0-2b250f697778",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "0.918000",
      "relevance": "STRONG",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "SECONDARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.918000",
      "interpretive_steps": 1
    },
    {
      "kept": "f90c223a-0246-84fa-a953-e12d7e108da9",
      "link": "d36d34ea-e26f-8983-abe7-e0b129528dbc",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "66ef4b93-6f73-8af7-91d6-9dc43a584153",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "f90c223a-0246-84fa-a953-e12d7e108da9",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "4ae2f575-115c-8789-bcac-74e2e0a0ce42",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.0928",
    "permissive": "0.9780",
    "conservative": "0.8852"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "HIGH",
  "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.9487",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "2.918000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25912,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 2,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "884de0c1-64da-8cbc-9e3c-a57a55d0b810",
        "d36d34ea-e26f-8983-abe7-e0b129528dbc",
        "f90c223a-0246-84fa-a953-e12d7e108da9"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.918000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 4
}