Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

The opposing medial and lateral orbitofrontal signals were observed in six clinically implanted patients performing a specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch; electrode placement was determined by clinical needs, so the result is task- and sample-specific rather than a population-wide localization claim.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 25779

42 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablean inference word joins a premise to a conclusion; consider separate claims and an edge

Referenced 80 times: checked 0, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 80, shared 0. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Not filed under any topic yet.

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7eae0bfc-4179-8b4a-aa5e-0610afd3d581

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.

Related: NARROWS outgoing: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary article directly supports the six-patient clinically sampled design and the specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch. weight 1.800000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
afd3d581NARROWSa6f2e434

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyese95c28b9, ee5e8771

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary article directly supports the six-patient clinically sampled design and the specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch. 7dd5a4bf

Qualifier: The opposing medial–lateral OFC signals come from six clinical patients and a specific six-second task epoch, with non-randomized, non-blinded electrode sampling driven by clinical needs. 763383d3

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 4c3bd023

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7eae0bfc-4179-8b4a-aa5e-0610afd3d581

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
25779APPENDED
25780ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
25781TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25785TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)