Claim
The opposing medial and lateral orbitofrontal signals were observed in six clinically implanted patients performing a specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch; electrode placement was determined by clinical needs, so the result is task- and sample-specific rather than a population-wide localization claim.
42 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablean inference word joins a premise to a conclusion; consider separate claims and an edgeTopics
Not filed under any topic yet.
Assessment
Supported
Main unresolved issue: 2 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:7eae0bfc-4179-8b4a-aa5e-0610afd3d581
Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.
Why?
Strongest counted support: The primary article directly supports the six-patient clinically sampled design and the specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch. weight 1.800000 evidence
Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed
What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.
Your view
Registered views
Nobody has registered a view yet.
Evidence for
-
From Intracranial recordings in humans reveal differential contributions of medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex to approach–avoidance decision-making Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Supports the narrowed sample- and task-specific characterization.
Evidence against
None.
Qualifications
-
From Intracranial recordings in humans reveal differential contributions of medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex to approach–avoidance decision-making Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted
Adds denominator, clinical sampling, task timing/trial scope, electrode-placement selection, and non-randomized/non-blinded design limitations.
Suppressed as dependent
None.
Inferences
Concluded from
None.
Used as a premise in
None.
Threads
None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.
Claim edges
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| afd3d581 | NARROWS | a6f2e434 |
Review checklist
Review checks: 1 of 4
| Check | Done | By |
|---|---|---|
| qualifiers reviewed | no | |
| opposing search done | no | |
| independence reviewed | no | |
| primary source reviewed | yes | e95c28b9, ee5e8771 |
Summary
Supported. The main support is: The primary article directly supports the six-patient clinically sampled design and the specific six-second gamified approach–avoidance decision epoch. 7dd5a4bf
Qualifier: The opposing medial–lateral OFC signals come from six clinical patients and a specific six-second task epoch, with non-randomized, non-blinded electrode sampling driven by clinical needs. 763383d3
A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 4c3bd023
Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:7eae0bfc-4179-8b4a-aa5e-0610afd3d581
Contribution history
| seq | event | detail |
|---|---|---|
| 25779 | APPENDED | |
| 25780 | ACCEPT | AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION |
| 25781 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |
| 25785 | TASK_RESULT | by 1efd24fe (accepted) |