Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the study, the TaNPF7.6-A1mod wheat allele had higher transcription and nitrate-transport activity than TaNPF7.6-A1lan and was associated with greater nitrogen-use efficiency.

Type OBSERVATIONAL · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 20355

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 120 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 79, shared 39. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Environment · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9734 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:bd23a146-4532-89ce-a42b-9cee840855c0

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports the allele comparison and NUE result. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly states TaNPF7.6-A1mod had higher transcription and nitrate transport activity than TaNPF7.6-A1lan, resulting in greater NUE.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
08d4fb2254cdf5c2

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes54cdf5c2, 71f2587c, ef456455, a24754f9

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study reports the allele comparison and NUE result. e5308ca7

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 08d4fb22

Qualifier: The allele comparison is supported in defined Chinese wheat populations and genetic backgrounds across specified normal/low-nitrogen field and hydroponic conditions, not an unbounded wheat-wide estimate. ea6427cf

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:bd23a146-4532-89ce-a42b-9cee840855c0

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
20355APPENDED
20356ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
20373LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20425LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24509TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25538TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)