Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe Technology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study states the dimensional scaling for ordered atomic arrays. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage states that for dimensions one, two, and three, maximal decay rate divided by individual decay rate scales as N^(3/2−1/(2D)).

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A 2026 Nature Physics study derived asymptotically tight bounds for maximal correlated decay in Markovian many-body quantum systems and obtained universal...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study states the dimensional scaling for ordered atomic arrays.

  From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary array-scaling result.

• The passage states that for dimensions one, two, and three, maximal decay rate divided by individual decay rate scales as N^(3/2−1/(2D)).

  From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The N^(3/2−1/(2D)) exponent is an asymptotic large-array result for ordered two-level atomic lattices in free space, normalized by the average individual decay rate; finite-size, lattice-spacing, and limit-order effects can change the observed scaling.

  From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Clarifies population/model, denominator, asymptotic range, finite-size dependence, and limiting-case exceptions.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
693ec677		04a4ed23

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	04a4ed23, 10ed959a, 8e9fa4a4

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19133	APPENDED
19134	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19143	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24477	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25477	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)