Claim

For ordered atomic arrays in free space, the study reported that maximal decay rate divided by the individual decay rate scales with atom number as N^(3/2 − 1/(2D)) for array dimensionality D equal to 1, 2 or 3.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 19133

38 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 85 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 61, shared 23. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Physics · 1efd24fe Technology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:c42eebda-edc1-8a2c-9e7a-bb95141bc9c3

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study states the dimensional scaling for ordered atomic arrays. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage states that for dimensions one, two, and three, maximal decay rate divided by individual decay rate scales as N^(3/2−1/(2D)).

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 3 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:76ebfa31bd9af0f8e9c3d4c6cccdf3399fb7718e9d46ba85c8a607958a35375b

Last changed at entry seq 25478; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

Link	Working	Weight	Counted as
04a4ed23 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	1.800000
10ed959a qualify	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	2.000000	0.000000 (non directional)
8e9fa4a4 support	relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1	1.800000	0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept 04a4ed23)

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 1.800000 (the counted weights) = 1.800000 → probability 0.8581

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.7790 to 0.9121, a spread of 0.1331.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

“A 2026 Nature Physics study derived asymptotically tight bounds for maximal correlated decay in Markovian many-body quantum systems and obtained universal...” · 2 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

The primary study states the dimensional scaling for ordered atomic arrays.

From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Primary array-scaling result.
The passage states that for dimensions one, two, and three, maximal decay rate divided by individual decay rate scales as N^(3/2−1/(2D)).

From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

The N^(3/2−1/(2D)) exponent is an asymptotic large-array result for ordered two-level atomic lattices in free space, normalized by the average individual decay rate; finite-size, lattice-spacing, and limit-order effects can change the observed scaling.

From Universal scaling laws for correlated decay of many-body quantum systems Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

Clarifies population/model, denominator, asymptotic range, finite-size dependence, and limiting-case exceptions.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
693ec677		04a4ed23

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	04a4ed23, 10ed959a, 8e9fa4a4

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary study states the dimensional scaling for ordered atomic arrays. cc8f29c2

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 693ec677

Qualifier: The N^(3/2−1/(2D)) exponent is an asymptotic large-array result for ordered two-level atomic lattices in free space, normalized by the average individual decay rate; finite-size, lattice-spacing, and limit-order effects can change the observed scaling. ac3c7641

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:c42eebda-edc1-8a2c-9e7a-bb95141bc9c3

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19133	APPENDED
19134	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19143	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24477	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25477	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "c42eebda-edc1-8a2c-9e7a-bb95141bc9c3",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "6e8221ae-65db-8af4-9217-403704a4ed23",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "0cf50ef1-609a-88e3-8a6f-7694cc8f29c2",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "1.800000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "79b97d25-1173-8c0d-9e5d-487310ed959a",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "764af399-d443-87ab-9bbc-f975ac3c7641",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "6e8221ae-65db-8af4-9217-403704a4ed23",
      "link": "8497c4ee-04ee-8b35-bf7d-c86c8e9fa4a4",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "1c988b61-5416-838b-af45-021b693ec677",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1331",
    "permissive": "0.9121",
    "conservative": "0.7790"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "QUANTITATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8581",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "1.800000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25478,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "6e8221ae-65db-8af4-9217-403704a4ed23",
        "79b97d25-1173-8c0d-9e5d-487310ed959a",
        "8497c4ee-04ee-8b35-bf7d-c86c8e9fa4a4"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "1.800000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}