Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the Catalonia pre-service-teacher study, conflict-related pathways were limited to the Moroccan target group.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 13845

Referenced 113 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 90, shared 22. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:e7be20fa-2f77-8aa7-bcda-b51200b33b3f

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from link.springer.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Related: NARROWS incoming: Supported

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study’s abstract says conflict-related pathways were limited to the Moroccan target group. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly states that conflict-related pathways were limited to the Moroccan target group.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
209f14a0b64f3d25

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

FromRelationshipTo
e24b639dNARROWS00b33b3f

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes89038432, b64f3d25, 1180f903

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study’s abstract says conflict-related pathways were limited to the Moroccan target group. 122df1c1

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 209f14a0

Qualifier: The source limits the comparison to Moroccan and Latin American target groups rather than immigrant groups generally. bc01ba4f

A narrower version of this claim is supported. e24b639d

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 5f7adf6a

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:e7be20fa-2f77-8aa7-bcda-b51200b33b3f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
13845APPENDED
13846ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
13851LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
13853TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
13917TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)