Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

A 2026 comparative analysis of overlapping genes across 253 prokaryotic, 115 plant, and 111 animal genomes found co-oriented overlaps predominant in prokaryotes and nested overlaps predominant in eukaryotes, with distinct lineage-specific gain/loss and expression patterns.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 18506

35 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 24 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 15, shared 8. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9468 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

2 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:f9c09f42-1839-8756-b6cb-eb755bab0cf2

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from nature.com and scienmag.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The study reports different overlap topologies, evolutionary transition rates, and nested-gene expression patterns across prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports the genome counts, topology differences, lineage-specific gain/loss rates, and nested-gene expression patterns.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Leans supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
976a3e256ceeb510

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes6ceeb510, e4d9cfd7

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The study reports different overlap topologies, evolutionary transition rates, and nested-gene expression patterns across prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. b9759ea0

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 976a3e25

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:f9c09f42-1839-8756-b6cb-eb755bab0cf2

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
18506APPENDED
18507ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18514LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
18516LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
18532TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)