Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports the randomized design, sample size, two-week intervention, non-significant well-being and stress differences, and null between-group connectedness result. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports the two-week randomized comparison, numerically favorable but non-significant well-being and stress results, and the null between-group connectedness result.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A two-week pilot randomized trial of guided nature-based mindfulness versus unstructured outdoor walking found numerically favorable but non-significant...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026
• “A two-week pilot randomized trial of guided nature-based mindfulness versus unstructured outdoor walking found numerically favorable but non-significant...” · 1 claim · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The abstract reports the randomized design, sample size, two-week intervention, non-significant well-being and stress differences, and null between-group connectedness result.

  From Does attention matter more than exposure? A pilot RCT of nature-based mindfulness for mental well-being and stress Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• The passage directly reports the two-week randomized comparison, numerically favorable but non-significant well-being and stress results, and the null between-group connectedness result.

  From Does attention matter more than exposure? A pilot RCT of nature-based mindfulness for mental well-being and stress Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

• A separate randomized trial found stronger cognitive, mood, and physiological responses for green-space walking versus indoor walking, providing contextual support for the pilot's direction while using a different comparator and acute design.

  From Psychophysiological restoration in nature: a randomized controlled trial investigating the cognitive, affective, and physiological benefits of green exercise Read 2026-09-29 Relevance WEAK Steps 0 Counted

  Contextual corroboration only; this does not replicate the pilot's outdoor-walking comparator or its non-significant between-group results.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

Evidence	Group	Kept instead
29af9de4		604b8d4a

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	4d86d51f, 604b8d4a, caaebe9c

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19190	APPENDED
19191	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19196	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
19214	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
19287	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)