Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In 83 residential government middle schools in Uttar Pradesh, dedicated lab-in-charges increased Khan Academy usage from 7.2 to 47.4 minutes per week.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22038 · qualifiers {"location":"83 residential government middle schools in Uttar Pradesh, India.","time_range":"31-week field experiment."}

Referenced 87 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 52, shared 33. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Education · 1efd24fe Technology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.9963 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

3 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability HIGH

Main unresolved issue: 4 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:3c7a1556-570a-83d3-8d11-0991ee73ba93

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from povertyactionlab.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports usage rising from 7.2 to 47.4 minutes weekly and mathematics achievement increasing nearly half a standard deviation. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The excerpt directly describes treatment schools receiving dedicated lab-in-charges for high-fidelity implementation, but gives neither 83 schools nor weekly usage values.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
082259f11323df20

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes0645f089, 1323df20, 6e84124b

Summary

Supported. The main support is: J-PAL independently summarizes the 31-week trial's 47.4-versus-7.2-minute usage difference and 0.44-standard-deviation mathematics advantage. 7c2e48d6

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 082259f1

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:3c7a1556-570a-83d3-8d11-0991ee73ba93

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
22038APPENDED
22039ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22050LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22052LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22062LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24993TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)