Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In mouse experiments, loss of GSDMD–TMEM106A protected against lethal sepsis but weakened antibacterial defence, while overexpression had opposite effects.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 21594

a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 106 times: checked 2, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 70, shared 34. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Biology · 1efd24fe Health · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:447b2486-e4fb-8a41-a5f1-19605ee4e29f

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary Nature study reports the reciprocal sepsis and antibacterial-defence outcomes after loss or overexpression. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The supplied passage directly reports reciprocal sepsis lethality and antibacterial-defense effects after loss or overexpression.; The primary study reports reciprocal host-defence and sepsis outcomes after loss or overexpression.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
dc701fc4522faf7c
6a34d157522faf7c

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes2d3fb20b, 6d1b8fc8, 522faf7c

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The primary Nature study reports the reciprocal sepsis and antibacterial-defence outcomes after loss or overexpression. 8987dfcd

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. dc701fc46a34d157

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found none. 067e0ecc

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:447b2486-e4fb-8a41-a5f1-19605ee4e29f

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
21594APPENDED
21595ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
21608LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
21638LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22322TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)