Claim

Model ledger-default@0.1.0 ledger-strict@0.1.0 ledger-default@0.2.0 ledger-strict@0.2.0 ledger-default@0.3.0 (default) ledger-strict@0.3.0 Snapshot seq

Topics

Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Why?

Strongest counted support: The primary study reports learning gains for government and NGO delivery models. weight 2.000000 evidence

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Registered views

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

• “A 2026 Nature study pooled five randomized trials of phone-based tutoring during school disruptions and reported cost-effective learning gains, including...” · 3 claims · 29 September 2026

Evidence for

• The primary study reports learning gains for government and NGO delivery models.

  From Mobile education builds resilience during shocks in five countries Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Primary randomized delivery-model comparison.

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

• The passage directly reports 0.40 operation-level improvement for government teachers and 0.30 for NGO teacher aides, but does not name Nepal and the Philippines.

  From Mobile education builds resilience during shocks in five countries Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  Both quantitative values and delivery groups are explicit; the two-country identification is not.

• The estimates are pooled across Nepal and the Philippines randomized delivery-model subset, not a universal result across all five country trials.

  From Mobile education builds resilience during shocks in five countries Read 2026-09-29 Relevance DIRECT Steps 0 Counted

  The comparison is restricted to the Nepal/Philippines subset and pooled across both contexts; it concerns primary-school learning during emergency delivery trials.

Suppressed as dependent

None.

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

Check	Done	By
qualifiers reviewed	no
opposing search done	no
independence reviewed	no
primary source reviewed	yes	9b9acdb5, 1d3763d9, 9108f5bf

Summary

Contribution history

seq	event	detail
19397	APPENDED
19398	ACCEPT	AUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
19413	LINK_EVIDENCE	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
24771	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)
25973	TASK_RESULT	by 1efd24fe (accepted)