Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In a randomized trial of 102 male U16–U18 basketball players, 30-second-per-region foam rolling produced lower adjusted post-test visual reaction times than 60-second-per-region rolling across best-trial, mean, and median scoring, but did not establish a scoring-independent benefit over passive rest.

Type COMPARATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 16166

39 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 75 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 57, shared 17. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Sports · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

2 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 1 by the author only

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:87728382-57fb-80c3-bedd-a9e86c3e0868

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.A quoted passage from journals.plos.org was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The trial reports lower adjusted reaction time for 30-second versus 60-second rolling across scoring methods, but no scoring-independent benefit over control. weight 2.000000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly supports the lower reaction time versus 60 seconds and the absence of a scoring-independent benefit over passive rest.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Hide calculation

0.8808 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745 · state Supported · Review checks: 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM · 3 sources, 1 independent lineage

Model ledger-default@0.3.0 (the default model, not the answer) · snapshot 27745 · trace sha256:8bf2803051c4095072d98909777f2b6765be002d0afee91a1d749df24142ad13

Last changed at entry seq 25772; nothing logged since has borne on this claim.

How the number was reached

Each counted link is weighed by multiplying the factors the model declares; a factor it does not declare is not shown. Every factor name below links to what that number means.

LinkWorkingWeightCounted as
d7ef227f qualify relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 2.000000 0.000000 (non directional)
984e0fb2 support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation DIRECT_TEXT 0.9 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 1.800000 0.000000 (dependent strongest only, kept cd0ab333)
cd0ab333 support relevance DIRECT 2.0 × observation MEASUREMENT 1.0 × interpretation 0 steps, 1 − 0.15 × 0 1.000000 × authenticity UNVERIFIED 1.0 × extraction UNVERIFIED 1.0 × provenance INDEPENDENT 1.0 × edition NAMED_OR_UNRELATED 1 2.000000 2.000000

prior 0.50 → log-odds 0.000000 + 2.000000 (the counted weights) = 2.000000 → probability 0.8808

Under neighbouring settings of the same model: 0.8022 to 0.9309, a spread of 0.1287.

Half-even rounding, six places for weights and four for the probability. The same inputs under the same model reproduce this exactly; that is what the trace hash above is for. How a score is worked out explains every factor, why it is there, and what the model sets it to.

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
ef9048a5cd0ab333

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

2 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyesd7ef227f, 984e0fb2, cd0ab333

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The trial reports lower adjusted reaction time for 30-second versus 60-second rolling across scoring methods, but no scoring-independent benefit over control. a971429b

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. ef9048a5

Qualifier: The result is a single-session, male youth-basketball comparison with unequal timing across groups and scoring-sensitive control contrasts, limiting generalization and practical recommendations. e5a3e63b

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:87728382-57fb-80c3-bedd-a9e86c3e0868

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
16166APPENDED
16167ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
16172LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
16216TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
25771TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)

Score trace

{
  "claim": "87728382-57fb-80c3-bedd-a9e86c3e0868",
  "links": [
    {
      "link": "5430f76b-4f9a-80df-817c-7eefd7ef227f",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "non_directional",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "31e054a0-caaf-8e3c-bd8a-e47fe5a3e63b",
      "direction": "QUALIFY",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "kept": "799f4a3b-0092-82e4-8865-8380cd0ab333",
      "link": "59a578c5-62bf-841f-96d6-4bb0984e0fb2",
      "group": null,
      "reason": "dependent_strongest_only",
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "fc077f26-0c17-8fab-9b3a-acadef9048a5",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "1.800000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "DIRECT_TEXT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "0.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    },
    {
      "link": "799f4a3b-0092-82e4-8865-8380cd0ab333",
      "group": null,
      "edition": "NAMED_OR_UNRELATED",
      "evidence": "d13143bf-9dcf-846e-ad4b-e2cca971429b",
      "direction": "SUPPORT",
      "magnitude": "2.000000",
      "relevance": "DIRECT",
      "extraction": "UNVERIFIED",
      "provenance": "INDEPENDENT",
      "observation": "MEASUREMENT",
      "source_type": "PRIMARY_TEXT",
      "authenticity": "UNVERIFIED",
      "audit_confirmed": false,
      "effective_weight": "2.000000",
      "interpretive_steps": 0
    }
  ],
  "model": "ledger-default@0.3.0",
  "prior": "0.50",
  "variants": {
    "spread": "0.1287",
    "permissive": "0.9309",
    "conservative": "0.8022"
  },
  "code_hash": "sha256:c61a6fdf35a754a0d7e958df149036a083c0eaeb7d2d2e52704ec32b0c36def7",
  "contested": false,
  "stability": "MEDIUM",
  "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE",
  "config_hash": "sha256:86768038080b8ab5233f1e4b7aba10af05b5bb44caa432095150b90e81209809",
  "probability": "0.8808",
  "provisional": true,
  "evidence_sum": "2.000000",
  "snapshot_seq": 25772,
  "prior_log_odds": "0.000000",
  "support_groups": 1,
  "model_dependent": false,
  "review_coverage": "0.25",
  "truth_evaluable": true,
  "assessment_state": "SUPPORTED",
  "review_checklist": {
    "qualifiers_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "opposing_search_done": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "independence_reviewed": {
      "by": [],
      "ok": false
    },
    "primary_source_reviewed": {
      "by": [
        "5430f76b-4f9a-80df-817c-7eefd7ef227f",
        "59a578c5-62bf-841f-96d6-4bb0984e0fb2",
        "799f4a3b-0092-82e4-8865-8380cd0ab333"
      ],
      "ok": true
    }
  },
  "contradict_groups": 0,
  "rounding_boundary": false,
  "posterior_log_odds": "2.000000",
  "not_applicable_reason": null,
  "independence_unreviewed": 3
}