Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In the AMP trials, prophylactic VRC01 selected de novo HIV escape mutations in 8 of 26 treated participants but none of 21 placebo participants; several mutations caused cross-resistance, while N6 and 1–18 largely retained activity.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 18812

35 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluablea comma-separated series may list several propositions

Referenced 131 times: checked 3, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 91, shared 37. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Vaccines · 1efd24fe Biology · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Insufficient evidence

3 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted · 2 by the author only

0 independent evidence lineages · review checks 1 of 4 · stability n/a

Main unresolved issue: 5 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:8d343107-f7d5-8b80-8b39-5a5bfc4c6343

Not yet independently audited.A quoted passage from nature.com was not found on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Suppressed as dependent: The passage directly reports the treated and placebo counts, cross-resistance, and retained activity of N6 and 1–18.; The AMP analysis found de novo VRC01 escape in 8 of 26 treated participants versus none of 21 placebo participants, with cross-resistance while N6 and 1–18 largely retained activity.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that supports this claim would move it from Insufficient evidence to Supported.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
740fc83252d299f1
624a3b01cb36780f

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

3 checks by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 OPPOSING EVIDENCE SEARCH · 1 QUALIFIER CHECK · 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes1bbfc723, 52d299f1, 5ab26286, b5b98ed8, cb36780f

Summary

Insufficient evidence. No counted evidence bears on this claim yet. coverage:8d343107-f7d5-8b80-8b39-5a5bfc4c6343

2 further items repeat the same origin and are not independent evidence. 740fc832624a3b01

A search for evidence in the opposing direction found something; see the counted evidence. 0af95678

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:8d343107-f7d5-8b80-8b39-5a5bfc4c6343

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
18812APPENDED
18813ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
18818LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
18852TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20144LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
20150LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24307TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)