Galedra
Sign in Sign up

Claim

In a randomized study of 436 participants, the ETUCARE online program increased study engagement and decreased academic procrastination over eight weeks compared with a control group.

Type QUANTITATIVE · truth-evaluable: yes · status at snapshot: ACTIVE · created seq 22691 · qualifiers {"population":"Participants randomly assigned to ETUCARE intervention or control groups.","time_range":"Eight weeks."}

26 words; atomic claims are usually under 25a conjunction joins clauses that may be separately evaluable

Referenced 97 times: checked 1, looked up by assistants 0, viewed 63, shared 33. A count of attention, not evidence.

Topics

Psychology · 1efd24fe Education · 1efd24fe

Assessment

Supported

Score: 0.8581 under ledger-default@0.3.0 at snapshot 27745

1 of 4 review checks done · 1 counted

1 independent evidence lineage · review checks 1 of 4 · stability MEDIUM

Main unresolved issue: 3 counted evidence items have no independence review; repeats of one origin may be counted as several coverage:ca3e1d34-ad16-8755-a2c2-64bf9780e803

Not yet independently audited.Evidence reviewed so far supports this claim, but only 1 of 4 review checks has been done.Every quoted passage was confirmed on the page when Galedra fetched it.

Why?

Strongest counted support: The abstract reports random assignment of 436 participants and measurements at baseline and eight weeks. weight 1.800000 evidence

Suppressed as dependent: The quoted passage directly supports the randomized study design, N=436 sample, and eight-week measurement period, but it does not state that engagement increased or procrastination decreased relative to control.

Review gaps: qualifiers reviewed, opposing search done, independence reviewed

What would most change this: One independent, direct measurement that contradicts this claim would move it from Supported to Unresolved.

Show calculation

Your view

Sign in to register whether you agree or disagree. A view is yours alone and never changes the assessment.

Registered views

Nobody has registered a view yet.

Registered views are personal belief, not evidence: they never change Galedra's assessment. Affiliations are self-declared and shown only for groups of 5 or more.

Checked as part of

Statements this claim was broken out of. The claim is scored on its own; a statement's reading only counts its claims.

Evidence for

Evidence against

None.

Qualifications

None.

Suppressed as dependent

EvidenceGroupKept instead
261422fb7df7b957

Inferences

Concluded from

None.

Used as a premise in

None.

An inference is interpretation, not evidence: it never changes the assessment of its conclusion. Each premise is a claim with its own evidence.

Threads

None. Threads are for disagreements about how a determination was made — a statement whose figures are not in the passage it rests on, two sources that may share an origin. Something about the world belongs in the evidence above.

Claim edges

None. Edges are stored and displayed; v0.1 does not propagate probability across them.

Review checklist

Review checks: 1 of 4

1 check by this claim's own author, alongside the independent review above. 1 EVIDENCE VERIFICATION. A check by the person who recorded a claim does not raise its review coverage.

CheckDoneBy
qualifiers reviewedno
opposing search doneno
independence reviewedno
primary source reviewedyes0c94895f, 09da03df, 7df7b957

Summary

Supported. The main support is: The abstract reports random assignment of 436 participants and measurements at baseline and eight weeks. a5fde4d8

1 further item repeats the same origin and is not independent evidence. 261422fb

Review checks: 1 of 4. coverage:ca3e1d34-ad16-8755-a2c2-64bf9780e803

Generated by stub-v0.1; every sentence cites graph ids.

Contribution history

seqeventdetail
22691APPENDED
22692ACCEPTAUTOMATIC_AFTER_VALIDATION
22703LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
22705LINK_EVIDENCEby 1efd24fe (accepted)
24609TASK_RESULTby 1efd24fe (accepted)